As we grew up, many of us learned that the world would give us all that we need, without our having to worry about limits. Now we know we need to curb our appetite for mineral, vegetable, and animal resources. Resources are indeed abundant; they are also finite,and sometimes toxic to extract, especially when we try to suck or scrape out the last drop.
The notion of abundant resources has embedded itself into our theologies of stewardship. “God has blessed me with abundance, so with gratitude I bless God back.” Many preachers believe that this idea has stood as the cornerstone of church finance since the Apostles. In reality, the “abundance” formula, while based on a reading of 2 Corinthians, is uniquely American. It was first articulated late in the 1800s, just as the nation’s wealth was starting to take off. As the temper of the times shifts from the old emphasis on abundant possibilities to the new consciousness of limits, we need to find a new sales pitch, perhaps even a new theology, for fund-drive time.
In the 1990s, the longest period of economic expansion in American history, “abundance” was the temper of the times. Optimism pumped up the price of dot-com stocks and encouraged us to pay too much for houses that, we thought, were good investments: “good as gold.” (An ounce of gold, worth $285 in 1998, fetches $1250 at this writing. Houses, as you may have heard, did worse. So did sanctuaries.)
The upbeat temper of the 1990s found expression in a boom in congregational budgets, building programs, and the popularity of “abundance theology.” With God, all things were possible, you see: faith helps us overcome caution and think big. “Abundance” appealed to people thinking about quitting one job in the certain faith that the next one would pay more, and to congregations flush from success at their third ambitious pledge drive in a row.
There is no shortage of proof-texts. John’s Jesus, for example, says, “I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.” (John 10, King James Version) But does this mean we can strip this world to the bones because we have another waiting? Does it mean scarcity is an illusion, a veil the eyes of faith will tear away? Both of these interpretations have done more than enough damage; it is time to renounce both.
But wait: Jesus then says something that might be more helpful in our time: A “hireling” shepherd, he points out, flees when the wolf comes. But Jesus is the “good shepherd.” “I lay down my life for the sheep,” he says.
John’s main point in telling this story is that Jesus’ care extends to non-Jews—those “other sheep I have, which are not of this fold.” In John’s time the immediate issue was how and whether to include Gentiles among Jesus’ followers. In our time the immediate issue is how and whether to take risks and make sacrifices to protect the world from its main predator. That predator, as it now appears, is us.
For wolves, a good theology might be: “So many sheep, so little time.” Human beings living in the third millennium need a theology that teaches our connections with our fellow humans, with the wider web of living beings, and with nonliving resources on which we all depend. Above all, it requires a heightened consciousness of our connection to the future. “In the long run,” the economist John Maynard Keynes remarked, “we’re all dead.” But faith calls us to include those who will live after us among our flock. It is as hard a task as Jesus ever set for his disciples.
A new theology of stewardship need not be joyless or ascetic. But it does need to be hard-headedly aware that religious institutions, too, are under judgment for their unchecked wants. Congregations need to make a case to their financial donors that makes sense when all consumption—even theirs—must be considered for its impact on a wider flock than most of us have chosen in the past to care about.
Some congregations have begun to shift their emphasis. Many teach their children conservation as a religious virtue; a few have invested heavily in “green” architecture and technology. It is not always clear, however, where concern for the environment comes from. Is it an import from the secular world? Or does it reflect a deeper shift at the spiritual center?
I believe that clergy who are willing to question the conventional theology of stewardship will find support for their labors. Here are some reasons why:
- People are more skeptical of glib claims on their generosity than they once were. Even donors for whom church support is an unquestioned obligation don’t assume they need to give to your church. Congregations need to make a case for themselves as worthy recipients of generosity. As global warming, resource depletion, and species extinction become pressing concerns, the people in the pews will expect clergy to address these moral issues, and the church to set a good example.
- The limitless growth of affluence no longer is a widely shared American experience. Personal incomes have stagnated since the mid-1970s. There is little reason to expect the 1950s to return soon, at least not to the western hemisphere.
- The moral goodness of consumption has come into question in new ways. Global warming and the depletion of resources like oil and drinking water have shifted our metaphors for moral living. In place of the expansive and triumphal vision of the good life, we are—or should be—shifting to a more conserving and sustaining vision.
Like any project in theology, constructing a new vision to support fundraising in the church must be a collective project, with theologians and grassroots religious people all contributing their bit. But for changing people’s minds about important things like how to manage resources, there’s no pulpit like the pulpit.
Comment on this article on the Alban Roundtable blog
Governance and Ministry:
Rethinking Board Leadership
by Dan Hotchkiss
In Governance and Ministry, Alban senior consultant Dan Hotchkiss offers congregational leaders a roadmap and tools for changing the way boards and clergy work together to lead congregations. Hotchkiss demonstrates that the right governance model is the one that best enables a congregation to fulfill its mission—to achieve both the outward results and the inward quality of life to which it is called.
Ministry and Money:
A Guide for Clergy and Their Friends
by Dan Hotchkiss
Alban senior consultant Dan Hotchkiss uses frank, straightforward guidance to help clergy develop a sound theology of money, as well as skills for church administration. Ministry and Money puts forth a new strategy for self-care, and a confident approach to managing both personal and congregational finances. Hotchkiss wants to help clergy overcome their own anxieties about money matters so they can help others address the personal, social, and congregational aspects of this challenging and often difficult topic.
Pastors are called to be not only leaders with vision but also managers of congregational systems, says John Wimberly in The Business of the Church. Drawing on his thirty-six years in ordained ministry, Wimberly weaves the realities of congregational dynamics and faith-centered purpose together with practical, proven approaches to business management, helping readers avoid common pitfalls and put into practice effective techniques of congregational management. The author’s conversational writing style and many real-life examples make what is for some a seemingly complicated, mysterious topic an engaging and easily applicable read.
In a culture marked by a consumerist approach to nearly everything, it’s little wonder that there is much confusion about who and what the church is supposed to be. Barger argues passionately for congregations to reexamine what it means to be an authentic church in a culture where authenticity is hard to come by. He exhorts leaders to turn away from the story of our culture and to return to the story of the church, which is grounded in Christ and the resurrection.
Webinars: Wednesdays, October 12, 19, 26, 2010
12:00 pm EDT
Facilitator: Bradford Agry, career consultant and leadership trainer
Three online-learning opportunities addressing essential skills for a tight economy, whether you’re a job-seeker or an employer expecting to hire new staff. Share this with someone in your congregation who could benefit by registering. Can be viewed individually or as a series.
Copyright © 2010, the Alban Institute. All rights reserved. We encourage you to share articles from the Alban Weekly with your congregation. We gladly allow permission to reprint articles from the Alban Weekly for one-time use by congregations and their leaders when the material is offered free of charge. All we ask is that you write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org and let us know how the Alban Weekly is making an impact in your congregation. If you would like to use any other Alban material, or if your intended use of the Alban Weekly does not fall within this scope, please complete our reprint permission request form.
Subscribe to the Alban Weekly.
Archive of past issues of the Alban Weekly.